Is Election Petition A Necessity?

By Aliyu Mariam Maitasamu U17MM1128

In the last 5 general elections conducted in Nigeria, a total of 3959 petitions were filed by candidates or political parties challenging the outcome of the elections.

Election petition is sui generis, that is in a class of its own. Unlike other court matters, it has a duration of 180 days as provided by the Electoral Act, 2022, mainly because it has to do with governance in Nigeria. Election petitions have become a common phenomenon in Nigerian cycle where candidates who participated in an election and are dissatisfied, go to the election tribunal to challenge the result of the election by presenting evidence that raises serious doubts about the integrity and credibility of the process.

Petitioners hardly succeed because the standard of proof in election matters are usually strict and the burden of proof lies entirely on the petitioner. By the Electoral Act, 2022 the petitioner has 21 days to file their petition and within the 21 days they're expected to have gathered all their materials, witnesses, and evidence to prove their petition. The evidence and statements of witnesses are expected to be filed with the petition. Considering the stringent process, it is rare for a petitioner to win an election petition and in turn be declared as the winner of the election. 

For the petitioner to succeed in election petition they have to prove to the court that INEC failed to substantially comply with the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 as amended 2010, Electoral Act, Rules and Regulations or there was electoral malpractice during the conduct of the election. Proving lack of substantial compliance and/or electoral malpractice is very difficult because most a-times the parties' agents who are stationed at every electoral Polling Unit or Ward sign electoral forms (such as Forms EC8A and EC8B) that shows that INEC has substantially complied with the regulations. The agents are expected to refuse to sign the forms and raise alarm when they find any malpractice.

According to Vanguard newspaper, as of 2019 the success rate of election petition was 10% which is very low and this is attributed to the difficulties in proving electoral malpractice lack of substantial compliance. At the end of the day the petitioner spends money on his/her legal team and wastes time with no beneficial result. This culminated into my question: is election petition a necessity?

Here's a video from a Channels Television curating the views of citizens on the issue of Election Petition





Comments

  1. It does seem like election petition is pretty much useless, since of course no petitioner ever succeeds.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's a mix of opinions which is contradicting so its not just a variable say

    ReplyDelete
  3. So in your opinion petitions are just pointless

    ReplyDelete
  4. Petitions as a whole should just be cancelled

    ReplyDelete
  5. Not a necessity but it creates avenues to test the law... Like how will you know how deep the river without atleast dipping a stick in it. 😁

    ReplyDelete
  6. Just because chances of the petitioner winning the case is slim doesn’t mean the court will shut its ears. It is a necessity, since the law is unbiased therefore it must grant the right to fair hearing since it’s a fundamental right!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Not a necessity, because looking at the condition and term guiding it and also the chances of winning the petition we will see that its not meant for the petitioner to win but for the questioned government elect to prove fidelity to their misconduct in an election.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Petitioners like any other aggrieved person in a civil suit, has a right of audience in court. Whether he wins or lose, is a matter of proof which is open to all parties involved. Besides petitions are the harvest for lawyers who may have toiled and planted for four years. The mouth God has created, He feeds it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Nice write up. However, despite enumerated failures highlited in the write up, election petition, other than resulting to self help provides agitators opportunities to explore the rule of law.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Considering the fact that the Petitioners hardly wins, the is rule is of law is been tested by given the Petitioners rights for fair hearing. Therefore, to my view I think Election Petition is a necessity.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Amazing write up 👏

    ReplyDelete
  12. I think it is a necessity also cause considering the stringent process it is rare for a petition to win an election and also be declared the winner of that election

    ReplyDelete
  13. Petitions have so far caused the evolution of the Rule of Law in that area. Therefore, whether a Petitioner wins or not, the fact that the cases are in Court and the law is evolving with them, is a win already. Besides there are candidates that have won pre-election matters. A profound example was when Aisha Dahiru (Binani) was declared the Governorship candidate of the APC in Adamawa State by the Court of Appeal in a pre-election matter.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Nicely written! That 10% success rate is also significant. The fact that it is hardly won doesn't mean it is never won.

    ReplyDelete
  15. petition is not a necessity

    ReplyDelete
  16. Until there is total independence of both the Judiciary and electoral body from the executive, election petitions will continue to be a dead on arrival story

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Unmasking the Mystery: The Journey of Living with Parkinson's Disease

Nigerian Young Filmmakers Make Debut In Hollywood As They Produce A Film With Hollywood Legend Morgan Freeman